For the Lowest Health Insurance Rates, Go Insurance Rates

Everyone who watched the State of the Union address on Wednesday were sitting on the edge of their seats waiting for President Barack Obama to discuss the ever-so-controversial health care bill - however, the wait was longer than we'd expected.

The good news is that he did actually touch on the bill in the second-half of his speech. The even better news is in his speech he urged lawmakers to move forward with the health care overhaul that has caused a great deal of dissension between the parties.

He Doesn't Plan to Scale Back

After Democrats faced their greatest nightmare - Republican Scott Brown winning Ted Kennedy's seat in Senate - there has been a lot of talk about compromising with the bill so Republicans would support it. However, Obama expressed no desire to scale back. "I will not walk away from these Americans," he said, "and neither should the people in this chamber."

No Plans Specifically Addressed

Obama did make an effort to address that health care is and will be a continuous problem unless a bill is passed that can make significant changes. He explained that his goal remains to same, which is to make sure that all Americans not just acquire health insurance but are also able to afford it.

Unfortunately, the speech didn't address the tactics necessary to actually pass the health care bill without the support of the Republican party. However, some Congressional aides have said that they expect to have a plan by the end of the week.

Responses to the Address

In Virginia Gov. Robert F. McDonnell's Republican party response, he was surprisingly supportive of Obama's efforts to push for health care reform. However, he did express his displeasure with all of the current solutions on the table.

He further explained that there were similarities between the Republican and Democratic versions, including allowing families and businesses to purchase insurance across state lines.

However, some are not as optimistic about the fate of health care reform. According to the Politico, the speech may be his last effort to get the bill passed. And even Democrats like Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana thought that passing the bill as is would be very difficult. "It's very hard to see a path forward in the current arrangement," she noted.

The unfortunate thing about politics is that it's just that - politics. When others are bickering over someone else's fate, it leaves those affected to just sit and hope that the fight actually results in a positive conclusion.

What was your take on President Obama's discussion on health care?

With all of the debate over health care in recent months, many have questioned whether our current health care system - or the many proposed versions of the health care overhaul - are sufficient enough to provide satisfactory care for the country. In fact, some believe that the United States should operate under a universal health care system like most other countries instead of sticking with private care options. (See our comparison of U.S. health care and the rest of the world)

In the countries that operate under this type of health care system, all citizens are required to receive some type of care, which is not the case in the United States. But despite the United States having steered clear of mandated coverage for years, is it a better health care system?

The Basics of Universal Health Care

Universal health care is a system that functions on a national level (as opposed to various private insurers working independently), and is sometimes referred to as national health care. It is by no means a new concept. In fact, the first universal health care system was achieved in Germany in the 1880s.

Since then, 32 of the 33 developed nations have adopted some type of universal health plan for their citizens. The only country that has yet to take on this type of plan is the United States.

The countries that operate under a national health care system offer one of three types of payment options:

• Single Payer: Under the single payer plan, the government provides insurance for all residents and pays all health care expenses except co-pays and coinsurance. The providers of the care may be private, public or a combination of the two.
• Two-Tier: For the countries that function under two-tier payment plans, the government provides or mandates catastrophic (or minimum) insurance coverage for all of its residents. At the same time, it allows residents to purchase additional voluntary insurance or fee-for-service care whenever they like.
• Insurance Mandate: Under this type of payment option, the government requires everyone to purchase insurance, whether it's through private, public or non-profit insurers. This type of system prohibits insurers from barring individuals with preexisting conditions.

The United States' current health care system is equal to none of the above; however, certain proposals to the health care overhaul could place it between the two-tier system and the insurance mandate. What will actually occur has yet to be determined.

Why Does the U.S. Avoids Socialized Health Care?

As the health care overhaul gets passed around in Congress, most Republicans have fought against any type of health care system that looks socialized. Socialized health care is defined as publicly-funded health care that is controlled by the government (i.e. the single payer plan).

So why is much of America against socializing health care? Here are a few arguments that have surfaced:

1. It is believed that this type of system would be a governmental intrusion into health care, resulting in a lack of control for citizens
2. A universal system could never be as efficient as private health insurers
3. Socialized medicine wouldn't be as effective as private medicine

But some also argue that there are benefits associated with this form of health care, including:

1. Mandatory health care for the nation, which could help to lower death rates associated with a lack of insurance
2. Health care costs that would be more affordable, especially with government contributions
3. Greater access to better facilities for all citizens

Those who stand against universal health care believe that the system we have is sufficient; however, those who argue in favor a universal health plan question whether America has been able to stand up to the countries offering this type of system.

U.S. Health Care Statistics

There have been plenty of published reports over the last few decades looking at the state of America's health care system. What's interesting is that in many instances, reports have found that our nation's health care has not measured up to countries that offer a universal form of health care.

For instance, in 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) ranked the United States 37th in the world for health care despite the fact that we offer some of the most advanced medical technologies and facilities in the world. In addition, 2009 data from the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) found that total health spending for the U.S. in 2007 was 16 percent of the gross national product, which was considerably higher than the worldwide average of 8.9 percent.

Also, infant mortality in the United States is higher than over 40 countries, including Slovenia, Germany and Spain, according to the CIA World Factbook. And the life expectancy for Americans ranks below nearly 50 countries with an average age of 78.11 (Canada, Australia and France all have average life expectancies above 80 years old).

After looking over the data, most figures point to the United States falling short in the health care arena. Even more ironic is that the majority of the countries that rank higher than the U.S. operate under universal health care systems.

To date, there are still 46 million people without health insurance in the United States, which means a large number of people are going without the appropriate health care, which many argue accounts for the below average numbers. Therefore, while the nation is fighting against universal health care, it seems to be both a cost-effective and comprehensive option for other countries. If you're in need of quality health care and are still uninsured, fill out our online health insurance form and you'll receive affordable health insurance quotes immediately. There are cost-effective solutions available to ensure you don't have to go uninsured.

GIR Question of the Day: Do you think we could benefit from universal health care?

After Republican Scott Brown's shocking win of Ted Kennedy's old Massachusetts seat last week, many have wondered just what will happen with the health care overhaul, but Republican senators insist that they don't want to fight over it.

Instead, they would like to find a way to make the bill...

Designed to provide affordable health insurance coverage for people who are too medically risky to get it (without paying impossible amounts), state health insurance plans play an important role in America's health care system. By gathering together large groups of people who the health...

It seems that Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown may not have as much of an effect on the fate of the health care overhaul as the House, as told by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. She noted on Thursday, Jan. 21 that she did not believe that the Senate's version of the health care reform had enough...

After months of fighting over the health care bill and finally getting to a place where it seemed that enough Congress members liked it, its fate is once again questioned after Republican Scott Brown won Ted Kennedy's Senate seat on Tuesday night.

Originally owning 60 seats in the Senate, now...

On Thursday, White House officials were able to reach a tentative agreement with labor leaders on a tax for high-cost health insurance policies. The agreement is said to be one of the last major obstacles on the road to finally passing a comprehensive health care legislation.

What is the New...

While nothing is final as of yet, word is circulating that the final health care bill may require that all Americans not only have health insurance, but prove it - on their tax returns. And if you don't prove it on your already-complicated tax form, you may just have to face a fine.

At least,...

As the health care overhaul bills still make their way through Congress, some wonder - when everything passes - will medical costs lower. Apparently, there is no adjustment, per se, to the traditional "fee for service" payments for doctors; however, Congress (both House and Senate) has proposed...

So-called "alternative medicine" - chiropractics, naturopathy, acupuncture and the like - may be getting too big to be called "alternative" anymore. According to the Center for Disease Control's National Center for Health Statistics, Americans spend approximately $34 billion out-of-pocket each...